I\'m writing unit tests for an application that already exists for a long time. Some of the methods I need to test are build like this:
public void someMetho
Since Exception
is a checked exception, you either:
try...catch
statement, orWhat you have up there works fine, but my personal preference is to declare the exception to be thrown. This way, if an exception I'm not expecting is thrown during the run of the test, the test will fail.
@Test
public void someTest() throws Exception {
// dodgy code here
}
If we need to see if a specific exception is thrown, then you have the option of using @Rule
or adding the value to the @Test
annotation directly.
@Test(expected = FileNotFoundException.class)
public void someTest() throws Exception {
// dodgy code here
}
In JUnit 5, you can leverage Assertions.assertThrows to accomplish the same thing. I'm less familiar with this overall since it's not yet GA at the time of editing, but it appears to accept an Executable
coming from JUnit 5.
@Test
public void someTest() {
assertThrows(FileNotFoundException.class, () ->
{ dodgyService.breakableMethod() };
}
Do not catch your application's exception in your test code. Instead, declare it to be thrown upwards.
Because, when JUnit's TestRunner
finds an exception thrown, it will automatically log it as an error
for the testcase.
Only if you testcase
expects that the method should thrown an Exception
you should use @Test(expected=Exception.class)
or catch the exception.
In other cases, just throw it upwards with,
public void someTest() throws Exception {
What kind of exception is it? Is it
If it's 1. I would just put it at the method signature level because a try-catch is serving no real purpose other than ceremony.
@Test
public void testFoo() throws Exception {
// ...
}
If it's 2. it becomes a little more complicated. You need to ask yourself what should be happening if the Exception is thrown. Should the test fail? Is it expected? Is it irrelevant? Examples below of how to handle all of these. BEWARE: I only used Exception because you did. I hope it really isn't though because if it's possible for some other exception to be thrown other than the expected then these will be very wonky. If possible don't use Exception
, use something more specific (in the junit and code).
// The below code assumes you've imported the org.junit.Assert class.
@Test
public void thisShouldFailIfExceptionCaught() {
//Given...
try {
// When...
} catch (Exception e) {
Assert.fail();
}
// Then...
}
@Test
public void thisShouldPassOnlyIfTheExceptionIsCaught() {
//Given...
try {
// When...
Assert.fail();
} catch (Exception expected) {}
// No "then" needed, the fact that it didn't fail is enough.
}
@Test
public void irrelevantExceptionThatCouldBeThrown() {
//Given...
try {
// When...
} catch (Exception e) {}
// Then...
}
@Test
public void someTest() {
try {
someMethod();
}
catch (Exception e) {
Assert.fail("Exception " + e);
}
}
Is what you can do, if the exception should not occur. An alternative would be to throw the exception in the signature like this:
@Test
public void someTest() throws Exception {
someMethod();
}
The difference is, that in one case the test will fail with an assertion exception and in the other case it will fail because the test crashed. (like somewhere in your code you get a NPE and the test will because of that)
The reason you have to do this, is because Exception is a checked exception. See Checked versus unchecked exception
The @Test(expected=Exception.class) is for tests, that want to test that the exception will be thrown.
@Test(expected=ArrayIndexOutOfBounds.class)
public void testIndex() {
int[] array = new int[0];
int var = array[0]; //exception will be thrown here, but test will be green, because we expect this exception
}
There are two main rules on how to process exceptions at Junit testers:
If the exception was originated into the tested code:
expected
attribute of the Test
annotation. Or, if further checks should be done on the exception object itself, catch it and ignore it. (In this case, there must be also a call to Assert.fail
at the end of the try
block, to indicate that the expected exception was not produced).Exception.printStackTrace
is also useful).If the exception was not originated into the tested code or it is not interesting to the test (for example, most of the IOExceptions are produced at network level, before the test could even be completed), rethrow it at the throws
clause.
Why you should expect an exception in the tester? Remind: You should code one test method for every possible result on the tested code (in order to achieve a high code coverage): In your case, one method that must return successfully, and at least another one that must produce an Exception.
You can add exception in test method signature. Then, if you are testing whether exception is thrown, you have to use @Test(expected=Exception.class)
. In the test cases where exception has not to be thrown, test will pass successfully.
@Test
public void testCaseWhereExceptionWontBeThrown() throws Exception {
someMethod(); //Test pass
}
@Test(expected = Exception.class)
public void testCaseWhereExceptionWillBeThrown() throws Exception {
someMethod(); //Test pass
}