Java data transfer object naming convention?

前端 未结 5 1369
不知归路
不知归路 2020-12-04 05:44

Given this scenario where you have \"transfer objects\" (POJO\'s with just getters/setters) which are passed by a client library to your API, what is the best way to name th

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2020-12-04 06:22

    I dont think there is a best practice or convention for a class exhibiting this kind of behavior. I personally dont like the word Object in any of the class names. You could either use some qualification like Poko.Car or use some naming convention like Car (for POJO) CarDa (for data access) CarBiz ( for business domain class)

    Or if you dont mind the word object in a class name go for something like CarDto (Car Data Transfer Object)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-04 06:27

    Data Transfer Object classes should follow the name convention defined in the Java Language Specification:

    Names of class types should be descriptive nouns or noun phrases, not overly long, in mixed case with the first letter of each word capitalized.

    ClassLoader
    SecurityManager
    Thread
    Dictionary
    BufferedInputStream
    

    [...]


    Suffixing a class name with DTO or Dto is not really meaningful and doesn't tell much about the class itself. Consider using names that describe the purpose of your classes.

    Here is a non-exhaustive list of name suggestions you could use:

    • SomeSortOfCommand
    • SomeSortOfConfiguration
    • SomeSortOfCredentials
    • SomeSortOfDetails
    • SomeSortOfElement
    • SomeSortOfEvent
    • SomeSortOfHeader
    • SomeSortOfInput
    • SomeSortOfInstruction
    • SomeSortOfItem
    • SomeSortOfMessage
    • SomeSortOfMetadata
    • SomeSortOfOperation
    • SomeSortOfOutput
    • SomeSortOfPayload
    • SomeSortOfProjection
    • SomeSortOfProperties
    • SomeSortOfQueryParameter
    • SomeSortOfQueryResult
    • SomeSortOfRepresentation
    • SomeSortOfRequest
    • SomeSortOfResource
    • SomeSortOfResponse
    • SomeSortOfResult
    • SomeSortOfRow
    • SomeSortOfSettings
    • SomeSortOfSpecification
    • SomeSortOfStatus
    • SomeSortOfSummary

    Note 1: Whether acronyms or all capitalized words should be handled as words or not, I guess it's up to you. Check the Java API and you will find some stumbles like ZipInputStream / GZIPInputStream. Both classes are in the same package and the name convention is not consistent. HttpURLConnection doesn't show any consistency with acronyms either.

    Note 2: Some names listed above were borrowed from this article written by Richard Dingwall (the original article seems to be no longer available, so here's a cached copy from Web Archive).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-04 06:40

    Use a convention that is suitable among the other code conventions you are using. I personally use the suffix "TO" (e.g. the data transfer object associated to the Customer domain class is named CustomerTO). Also the package structure should convey the intent of each type of class (so.foo.domain.Customer and so.foo.transport.CustomerTO)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-04 06:44

    Adding DTO or DAO or anything else violates DRY. The FQN is perfectly fine, especially if they're really the same thing.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-04 06:48

    I generally add 'DTO' to the end of the Class name as well as place all the DTO's in their own package. In your example I would call it com.x.core.dto.CarDTO.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题