I want to read unsigned integers in base-10 (decimal) representation from a C++ iostream with at least rudimentary error detection. In my view, minus signs would clearly be
Consulting C++03, 22.2.2.1.2/11, the formats are inherited from scanf
and friends, which in turn all say that the converted character sequence is "optionally signed", even for the ones with unsigned output. strtoul
is the same.
So, I suppose you could say the standard that mandates the behavior is C89 for C++03, C99 for C++11.
Since the -
happens to be allowed only as the first character, I suppose that the workaround is to check for it with peek
before using operator>>
.
If I read 22.2.2.1.2/table 5 correctly it shows that extracting into an unsigned is equivalent to scanf
with %u
which appears to also do the negative -> positive conversion.
Would it be really different if you'd done this?
int i;
unsigned int u;
c >> i;
u = i;
std :: cout << u;
It doesn't matter so much that operator>>
tolerates the sign mismatch because the underlying C rules will allow a silent conversion in any case. You're not fundamentally adding any safety by "strengthening" the input operator.
That said, my gcc (4.3.5 on Solaris) says it's a conversion error.