In Perl, is it appropriate to use map in void context instead of a foreach loop?

Question

In Perl, if you have a loop like this:

foreach (@items) {
    perform_action($_);
}

you can replace it with a call to map in v

Answer 1

The problem with using map or grep in void context is mainly conceptual. Both are constructs whose job is to return a list. To discard that list makes for muddled code, unclear on the concept of listops. I never use either of those in void context myself.

I feel the same way about the ternary conditional operator. Its job is to return a value, so using it in void context makes no sense and just confuses people.

That said, I wouldn’t put too much stock into Perl::Critic or even PBP. I guess it’s better that the book exists than that it doesn’t, but people too often misunderstand the whole point and end up using it as a bludgeon.

Answer 2

I believe 'Perl Best Practices' would recommend using an explicit variable in the foreach loop as the best style - it is certainly what I'd use.

foreach my $item (@items)
{
    perform_action($item);
}

It is an abuse of map (or grep) to use it in a void context.

Answer 3

Starting from Perl 5.8.1 map in void context is not expensive:

map in void context is no longer expensive. map is now context aware, and will not construct a list if called in void context.

But the postfix form of for may be more readable:

perform_action($_) for @items;