Find all local Maxima and Minima when x and y values are given as numpy arrays

Question

I have two arrays x and y as :

x = np.array([6, 3, 5, 2, 1, 4, 9, 7, 8])
y = np.array([2, 1, 3, 5, 3, 9, 8, 10, 7])

Answer 1

You do not need this while loop at all. The code below will give you the output you want; it finds all local minima and all local maxima and stores them in minm and maxm, respectively. Please note: When you apply this to large datasets, make sure to smooth the signals first; otherwise you will end up with tons of extrema.

import numpy as np
from scipy.signal import argrelextrema
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

x = np.array([6, 3, 5, 2, 1, 4, 9, 7, 8])
y = np.array([2, 1, 3 ,5 ,3 ,9 ,8, 10, 7])

# sort the data in x and rearrange y accordingly
sortId = np.argsort(x)
x = x[sortId]
y = y[sortId]

# this way the x-axis corresponds to the index of x
plt.plot(x-1, y)
plt.show()
maxm = argrelextrema(y, np.greater)  # (array([1, 3, 6]),)
minm = argrelextrema(y, np.less)  # (array([2, 5, 7]),)

This should be far more efficient than the above while loop.

The plot looks like this; I shifted the x-values so that they correspond to the returned indices in minm and maxm):

As of SciPy version 1.1, you can also use find_peaks:

from scipy.signal import find_peaks

peaks, _ = find_peaks(y)

# this way the x-axis corresponds to the index of x
plt.plot(x-1, y)
plt.plot(peaks, y[peaks], "x")
plt.show()

That yields

The nice thing is, that you can now also easily also set a minimum peak height (e.g. 8):

peaks, _ = find_peaks(y, height=8)

# this way the x-axis corresponds to the index of x
plt.plot(x-1, y)
plt.plot(peaks, y[peaks], "x")
plt.show() 

Note that now the first peak is excluded as its height is below 8.

Furthermore, you can set also the minimal distance between peaks (e.g. 5):

peaks, _ = find_peaks(y, distance=5)

# this way the x-axis corresponds to the index of x
plt.plot(x-1, y)
plt.plot(peaks, y[peaks], "x")
plt.show()

Now the middle peak is excluded as its distance to the other two peaks is less than 5.

Answer 2

This will work fine.

Python uses += instead of ++.

Before you use i in a while loop you have to assign some value - in this case 0 - , this way initializing it to avoid error.

import numpy as np

x=np.array([6,3,5,2,1,4,9,7,8])
y=np.array([2,1,3,5,3,9,8,10,7])


sortId=np.argsort(x)
x=x[sortId]
y=y[sortId]
minm = np.array([])
maxm = np.array([])
i = 0
while i < y.size-1:
   while(y[i+1] >= y[i]):
      i+=1

   maxm=np.insert(maxm,0,i)
   i+=1
   while(y[i+1] <= y[i]):
      i+=1

   minm=np.insert(minm,0,i)
   i+=1

print minm, maxm

Answer 3

x=np.array([6,3,5,2,1,4,9,7,8])
y=np.array([2,1,3,5,7,9,8,10,7])

sort_idx = np.argsort(x)
y=y[sort_idx]
x=x[sort_idx]
minm=np.array([],dtype=int)
maxm=np.array([],dtype=int)
length = y.size
i=0

while i < length-1:
    if i < length - 1:
        while i < length-1 and y[i+1] >= y[i]:
            i+=1

        if i != 0 and i < length-1:
            maxm = np.append(maxm,i)

        i+=1

    if i < length - 1:
        while i < length-1 and y[i+1] <= y[i]:
            i+=1

        if i < length-1:
            minm = np.append(minm,i)
        i+=1


print minm
print maxm

minm and maxm contain indices of minima and maxima, respectively.