I have some class that I\'m passing as a result of a service method, and that class has a get-only property:
[DataContract]
public class ErrorBase
{
[DataM
[DataMember(Name = "PropertyName")]
public string PropertyName
{
get
{
return "";
}
private set
{ }
}
If you only have a getter, why do you need to serialize the property at all. It seems like you could remove the DataMember attribute for the read-only property, and the serializer would just ignore the property.
I had this problem with ASP.NET MVC and me wanting to use DataContractSerializer in order to be able to control the names on the items in the JSON output. Eventually I switched serializer to JSON.NET, which supports properties without setters (which DataContractSerializer doesn't) and property name control (which the built-in JSON serializer in ASP.NET MVC doesn't) via [JsonProperty(PropertyName = "myName")]
.