I wrote a realy simple code based on another question and here it is:
It throws me an error
java.lang.NullPointerException line 5 and 17
<
You used the Boolean instead of boolean. Boolean is a class, which means you can assign objects to it. In your case, you passed in a null, which is then assigned to param. You then tried to use param, which of course resulted in a NullPointerException.
You can:
bool(null)Boolean to boolean in the parameters for bool()param is nullnull cannot be auto-unboxed to a primitive boolean value, which is what happens when you try to compare it with true. In
param == true
The type of true is boolean, therefore the left-hand operand must also be a boolean. You are passing in a Boolean, which is an object, but can be auto-unboxed to boolean.
Therefore this is equivalent to
param.booleanValue() == true
Clearly, if param is null, the above throws NullPointerException.
To avoid the hidden pitfalls of auto-unboxing, you could instead work with the Boolean objects:
if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(param))
return "a";
if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(param))
return "b";
return "c";
So your program must be something like this.
public class BooleanBug {
public static String bool(Boolean param) {
if ((null != param) && param.booleanValue() == true) {
return "a";
} else if ((null != param) && param.booleanValue() == false) {
return "b";
}
return "c";
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(bool(true));
System.out.println(bool(null));
System.out.println(bool(false));
}
}
Your code compares a java.lang.Boolean instance with a primitive boolean, which means unboxing the java.lang.Boolean. Since null can't be unboxed, a NullPointerException is thrown.
You could work around this by using the built in constants Boolean.TRUE and Boolean.FALSE:
public static String bool(Boolean param) {
if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(param)) {
return "a";
} else if (Boolean.FALSE.equals(param)) {
return "b";
}
return "c";
}