I\'m defining an ID for my fragment in the xml layout:
The reasons mentioned above are valid but another possible reason is that you are trying to search for the fragment while being in a fragment this also results in fragmentManager.findFragmentById
to return null. We should use childFragmentManager.findFragmentById
to find the fragment inside a fragment.
According to the official documentation.
public final androidx.fragment.app.FragmentManager getChildFragmentManager()
Return a private FragmentManager for placing and managing Fragments inside of this Fragment.
R.id.test_fragment
is your LinearLayout
ID not your Fragment.
You can define and id on a fragment when it is inflated from an xml like in this sample http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/fundamentals/fragments.html#Adding
Use the <FrameLayout>
tag as a container in your layout file. Later to replace the fragments from your activity dynamically, you can use the ID of the <FrameLayout>
container to replace the fragments in your activity.
<FrameLayout
android:id="@+id/test_fragment"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent" />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<LinearLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
android:id="@+id/test_fragment"
it should be a fragment
not a LinearLayout
<fragment android:name="com.example.yourfragment"
android:id="@+id/test_fragment"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent" />
FragmentB fragmentB =
(FragmentB) getSupportFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.containerb);
if(fragmentB != null)
{
fragmentB.showuserResponse(msg);
}
Use container id as fragment id. And then check for null reference.
fragmentTransaction.add(R.id.fragment_container, myFragment);
MyFragment myFragment = (MyFragment) getFragmentManager().findFragmentById(R.id.test_fragment);
Please notice the difference.
You should pass R.id.fragment_container as the argument to findFragmentById
, as you pass it to the add function, instead of R.id.test_fragment
By the way , according to the inner implementation of the two functions, it should be right that the id can be that of its container view.