How can I get the correct text definition of a generic type using reflection?

Question

I am working on code generation and ran into a snag with generics. Here is a \"simplified\" version of what is causing me issues.

Dictionary

        

Answer 1

string text = dictionary.ToString();

provides almost what you are asking for:

System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.String,System.DateTime]

Answer 2

I don't think .NET has anything built-in that would do this, so you will have to do it yourself. I think that the reflection classes provide quite enough information to reconstruct the type name in this form.

Answer 3

There is no built-in way to get this representation in the .Net Framework. Namely because there is no way to get it correct. There are a good number of constructs that are not representable in C# style syntax. For instance "<>foo" is a valid type name in IL but cannot be represented in C#.

However, if you're looking for a pretty good solution it can be hand implemented fairly quickly. The below solution will work for most situations. It will not handle

1. Nested Types
2. Illegal C# Names
3. Couple of other scenarios

Example:

public static string GetFriendlyTypeName(Type type) {
    if (type.IsGenericParameter)
    {
        return type.Name;
    }

    if (!type.IsGenericType)
    {
        return type.FullName;
    }

    var builder = new System.Text.StringBuilder();
    var name = type.Name;
    var index = name.IndexOf("`");
    builder.AppendFormat("{0}.{1}", type.Namespace, name.Substring(0, index));
    builder.Append('<');
    var first = true;
    foreach (var arg in type.GetGenericArguments())
    {
        if (!first)
        {
            builder.Append(',');
        }
        builder.Append(GetFriendlyTypeName(arg));
        first = false;
    }
    builder.Append('>');
    return builder.ToString();
}

Answer 4

This evening I was toying a bit with extension methods and I tried to find an answer for your question. Here is the result: it's a no-warranty code. ;-)

internal static class TypeHelper
{
    private const char genericSpecialChar = '`';
    private const string genericSeparator = ", ";

    public static string GetCleanName(this Type t)
    {
        string name = t.Name;
        if (t.IsGenericType)
        {
            name = name.Remove(name.IndexOf(genericSpecialChar));
        }
        return name;
    }

    public static string GetCodeDefinition(this Type t)
    {
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
        sb.AppendFormat("{0}.{1}", t.Namespace, t.GetCleanName());
        if (t.IsGenericType)
        {
            var names = from ga in t.GetGenericArguments()
                        select GetCodeDefinition(ga);
            sb.Append("<");
            sb.Append(string.Join(genericSeparator, names.ToArray()));
            sb.Append(">");
        }
        return sb.ToString();
    }
}

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        object[] testCases = { 
                                new Dictionary<string, DateTime>(),
                                new List<int>(),
                                new List<List<int>>(),
                                0
                            };
        Type t = testCases[0].GetType();
        string text = t.GetCodeDefinition();
        Console.WriteLine(text);
    }
}

Answer 5

I believe you can pass

System.String, mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089

into Type.Parse(). That is a fully qualified type name, I think.

Answer 6

A good and clean alternative, thanks to @LukeH's comment, is

using System;
using System.CodeDom;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using Microsoft.CSharp;
//...
private string GetFriendlyTypeName(Type type)
{
    using (var p = new CSharpCodeProvider())
    {
        var r = new CodeTypeReference(type);
        return p.GetTypeOutput(r);
    }
}