Can I call memcpy() and memmove() with “number of bytes” set to zero?

前端 未结 2 1499
生来不讨喜
生来不讨喜 2020-12-01 05:38

Do I need to treat cases when I actully have nothing to move/copy with memmove()/memcpy() as edge cases

int numberOfBytes = ...
if(         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-01 06:25

    From the C99 standard (7.21.1/2):

    Where an argument declared as size_t n specifies the length of the array for a function, n can have the value zero on a call to that function. Unless explicitly stated otherwise in the description of a particular function in this subclause, pointer arguments on such a call shall still have valid values, as described in 7.1.4. On such a call, a function that locates a character finds no occurrence, a function that compares two character sequences returns zero, and a function that copies characters copies zero characters.

    So the answer is no; the check is not necessary (or yes; you can pass zero).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-01 06:28

    As said by @You, the standard specifies that the memcpy and memmove should handle this case without problem; since they are usually implemented somehow like

    void *memcpy(void *_dst, const void *_src, size_t len)
    {
        unsigned char *dst = _dst;
        const unsigned char *src = _src;
        while(len-- > 0)
            *dst++ = *src++;
        return _dst;
    }
    

    you should not even have any performance penality other than the function call; if the compiler supports intrinsics/inlining for such functions, the additional check may even make the code a micro-little-bit slower, since the check is already done at the while.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题