Chrome console already declared variables throw undefined reference errors for let

前端 未结 2 2038
傲寒
傲寒 2020-11-30 13:00

Recently I ran into this weird thing in chrome console. Here I am intentionally assigning an undefined thing to a in order to throw an error.

let a = werwr /         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-11-30 13:05

    This happens when you introduce the temporal dead zone to the global scope. As you might know, let declarations are hoisted but left uninitialised. Due to control flow, it can happen that a variable is never initialised:

    function …() {
        if (false)
            example; // would throw a ReferenceError if it was evaluated
        … // do something
        if (true)
            return; // stop!
        let example = 5; // never executed
    }
    

    This is fine in a function scope. Maybe something went wrong, maybe the variable wasn't needed at all - in the next call, a new scope with a new variable will be created.

    A similar thing can happen in the global scope, when you throw an exception before the variable is initialised (only exceptions work here as a control flow construct, nothing else achieves the same effect).

    throw new Error;
    let example = 5;
    

    In contrast to the function scope, it does matter here that the variable stays uninitialised. The global scope lasts forever, and the variable is eternally dead. It was not and will never be initialised, and lexical variables cannot be re-declared (which helps preventing mistakes).

    This was discussed on es-discuss, but deemed irrelevant. If top-level <script> execution throws an error, you have bigger problems than uninitialised variables. There is no path to recover. If you need one (e.g. by trying to re-declare it in successive scripts), you have to use var anyway.

    That you have the same problem in the devtools console is a bit of a nuisance, but could be solved for the console as a special scope.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-30 13:26

    You should know about hoisting in JS. Basically, a declaration like this let a = werwr;

    is interpreted as let a; a = werwr;

    And that why a is already declared when you run your second line of code.

    UPDATE

    So, there is a NOTE in ES specs https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#prod-LetOrConst

    let and const declarations define variables that are scoped to the running execution context's LexicalEnvironment. The variables are created when their containing Lexical Environment is instantiated but may not be accessed in any way until the variable's LexicalBinding is evaluated. A variable defined by a LexicalBinding with an Initializer is assigned the value of its Initializer's AssignmentExpression when the LexicalBinding is evaluated, not when the variable is created. If a LexicalBinding in a let declaration does not have an Initializer the variable is assigned the value undefined when the LexicalBinding is evaluated.

    ...

    "but may not be accessed in any way until the variable's LexicalBinding is evaluated" means that, the declaration must be successfully completed before you can access the variable (either getting value, assigning value, or doing typeof, or event delete);

    In your case, the variable's LexicalBinding is interupted by the exception.

    let a = werwr // Uncaught ReferenceError: werwr is not defined
    

    Please follow the link and read more about that. If you find a way to recover varaible a, please tell me. Thanks, today I found out something new about Javascript.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题