What's the difference between `useRef` and `createRef`?

后端 未结 5 766
感动是毒
感动是毒 2020-11-29 22:57

I was going through the hooks documentation when I stumbled upon useRef.

Looking at their example…

function TextInputWithFocusButton() {
  const inpu         


        
相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2020-11-29 23:06

    createRef always returns a new ref, which you'd generally store as a field on a class component's instance. useRef returns the same ref upon every render of a functional component's instance. This is what allows the state of the ref to persist between renders, despite you not explictly storing it anywhere.

    In your second example, the ref would be re-created upon every render.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 23:12

    tldr

    A ref is a plain JS object { current: <some value> }.

    React.createRef() is a factory returning a ref { current: null } - no magic involved.

    useRef(initValue) also returns a ref { current: initValue } akin to React.createRef(). Besides, it memoizes this ref to be persistent across multiple renders in a function component.

    It is sufficient to use React.createRef in class components, as the ref object is assigned to an instance variable, hence accessible throughout the component and its lifecyle:
    this.myRef = React.createRef(); // stores ref in "mutable" this context (class)
    

    useRef(null) basically is equivalent to useState(React.createRef())[0] 1.


    1 Replace useRef with useState + createRef

    Following tweet has been enlightening for me:

    useRef() is basically useState({current: initialValue })[0].

    With insights from the tldr section, we now can further conclude:

    useRef(null) is basically useState(React.createRef())[0].

    Above code "abuses" useState to persist the returned ref from React.createRef(). [0] just selects the value part of useState - [1] would be the setter.

    useState causes a re-render in contrast to useRef. More formally, React compares the old and new object reference for useState, when a new value is set via its setter method. If we mutate the state of useState directly (opposed to setter invocation), its behavior more or less becomes equivalent to useRef, as no re-render is triggered anymore:

    // Example of mutaing object contained in useState directly
    const [ref] = useState({ current: null })
    ref.current = 42; // doesn't cause re-render
    

    Note: Don't do this! Use the optimized useRef API instead of reinventing the wheel. Above is for illustration purposes.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 23:20

    The difference is that createRef will always create a new ref. In a class-based component, you would typically put the ref in an instance property during construction (e.g. this.input = createRef()). You don't have this option in a function component. useRef takes care of returning the same ref each time as on the initial rendering.

    Here's an example app demonstrating the difference in the behavior of these two functions:

    import React, { useRef, createRef, useState } from "react";
    import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
    
    function App() {
      const [renderIndex, setRenderIndex] = useState(1);
      const refFromUseRef = useRef();
      const refFromCreateRef = createRef();
      if (!refFromUseRef.current) {
        refFromUseRef.current = renderIndex;
      }
      if (!refFromCreateRef.current) {
        refFromCreateRef.current = renderIndex;
      }
      return (
        <div className="App">
          Current render index: {renderIndex}
          <br />
          First render index remembered within refFromUseRef.current:
          {refFromUseRef.current}
          <br />
          First render index unsuccessfully remembered within
          refFromCreateRef.current:
          {refFromCreateRef.current}
          <br />
          <button onClick={() => setRenderIndex(prev => prev + 1)}>
            Cause re-render
          </button>
        </div>
      );
    }
    
    const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
    ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
    

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 23:27

    Yet another but important addition to other's answers.

    You can't set a new value for createRef. But you can for useRef.

    const ur = useRef();
    const cr = createRef();
    
    ur.current = 10; // you can do it, and value is set
    cr.current = 10; // you can, but it's no good, it will not change it
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-29 23:31

    Just to highlight a purpose:

    createRef is as simple as return {current: null}. It's a way to handle ref= prop in most modern way and that's it(while string-based is toooo way magic and callback-based looks too verboose).

    useRef keeps some data before renders and changing it does not cause re-render(as useState does). They are rarely related. Everything you expect for class-based component go to instance fields(this.* =) looks like candidate to be implemented with useRef in functional components.

    Say useCallback works as bounded class methods(this.handleClick = .....bind(this)) and may be re-implemented(but we should not re-invent the wheel for sure) with useRef.

    Another examples are DOM refs, timeout/interval IDs, any 3rd party libraries' identifiers or references.

    PS I believe React team better chose different naming for useRef to avoid confusion with createRef. Maybe useAndKeep or even usePermanent.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题