Can anyone explain to me why the following example occurs?
#Create simple dataframe
assign( \"df\" , data.frame( P = runif(5) , Q = runif(5) , R = runif(5) )
Using assign
in the way you demonstrate in the question is at least uncommon in R. Normally you would just put all objects in a list.
So, instead of
for (i in 1:10) {
assign( paste( "Object" , i , sep = "." ) , rnorm(1000 , i) )}
you would do
objects <- list()
for (i in 1:10) {
objects[[i]] <- rnorm(1000 , i) }
In fact, this construct is so common that there is a (optimized) function (lapply
), which does something similar:
objects <- lapply(1:10, function(x) rnorm(1000,x))
You can then access, e.g., the first object as objects[[1]]
and there are several functions for working with lists.
To understand why this doesn't work, you need to understand what colnames<-
does. Like every function in that looks like it's modifying an object, it's actually modifying a copy, so conceptually colnames(x) <- y
gets expanded to:
copy <- x
colnames(copy) <- y
x <- copy
which can be written a little more compactly if you call the replacement operator in the usual way:
x <- `colnames<-`(x, y)
So your example becomes
get("x") <- `colnames<-`(get("x"), y)
The right side is valid R, but the command as a whole is not, because you can't assign something to the result of a function:
x <- 1
get("x") <- 2
# Error in get("x") <- 2 :
# target of assignment expands to non-language object