Algorithm to find articles with similar text

后端 未结 15 2431
梦谈多话
梦谈多话 2020-11-28 18:10

I have many articles in a database (with title,text), I\'m looking for an algorithm to find the X most similar articles, something like Stack Overflow\'s \"Related Questions

相关标签:
15条回答
  • 2020-11-28 18:40

    The link in @alex77's answer points to an the Sorensen-Dice Coefficient which was independently discovered by the author of that article - the article is very well written and well worth reading.

    I have ended up using this coefficient for my own needs. However, the original coefficient can yield erroneous results when dealing with

    • three letter word pairs which contain one misspelling, e.g. [and,amd] and
    • three letter word pairs which are anagrams e.g. [and,dan]

    In the first case Dice erroneously reports a coefficient of zero whilst in the second case the coefficient turns up as 0.5 which is misleadingly high.

    An improvement has been suggested which in its essence consists of taking the first and the last character of the word and creating an additional bigram.

    In my view the improvement is only really required for 3 letter words - in longer words the other bigrams have a buffering effect that covers up the problem. My code that implements this improvement is given below.

    function wordPairCount(word)
    {
     var i,rslt = [],len = word.length - 1;
     for(i=0;i < len;i++) rslt.push(word.substr(i,2));
     if (2 == len) rslt.push(word[0] + word[len]);
     return rslt;
    }
    
    function pairCount(arr)
    {
     var i,rslt = [];
     arr = arr.toLowerCase().split(' ');
     for(i=0;i < arr.length;i++) rslt = rslt.concat(wordPairCount(arr[i]));
     return rslt;
    }
    
    function commonCount(a,b)
    {
     var t;
     if (b.length > a.length) t = b, b = a, a = t; 
     t = a.filter(function (e){return b.indexOf(e) > -1;});
     return t.length;
    }
    
    function myDice(a,b)
    {
     var bigrams = [],
     aPairs = pairCount(a),
     bPairs = pairCount(b);
     debugger;
     var isct = commonCount(aPairs,bPairs);
     return 2*commonCount(aPairs,bPairs)/(aPairs.length + bPairs.length); 
    }
    
    $('#rslt1').text(myDice('WEB Applications','PHP Web Application'));
    $('#rslt2').text(myDice('And','Dan'));
    $('#rslt3').text(myDice('and','aMd'));
    $('#rslt4').text(myDice('abracadabra','abracabadra'));
    *{font-family:arial;}
    table
    {
     width:80%;
     margin:auto;
     border:1px solid silver;
    }
    
    thead > tr > td
    {
     font-weight:bold;
     text-align:center;
     background-color:aqua;
    }
    <script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
    <table>
    <thead>
    <tr>
    <td>Phrase 1</td>
    <td>Phrase 2</td>
    <td>Dice</td>
    </tr>
    <thead>
    <tbody>
    <tr>
    <td>WEB Applications</td>
    <td>PHP Web Application</td>
    <td id='rslt1'></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td>And</td>
    <td>Dan</td>
    <td id='rslt2'></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td>and</td>
    <td>aMd</td>
    <td id='rslt3'></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
    <td>abracadabra</td>
    <td>abracabadra</td>
    <td id='rslt4'></td>
    </tr>
    </tbody>
    </table>

    Note the deliberate misspelling in the last example: abracadabra vs abracabadra. Even though no extra bigram correction is applied the coefficient reported is 0.9. With the correction it would have been 0.91.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 18:41

    SO does the comparison only on the title, not on the body text of the question, so only on rather short strings.

    You can use their algorithm (no idea what it looks like) on the article title and the keywords. If you have more cpu time to burn, also on the abstracts of your articles.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 18:42

    It depends upon your definition of similiar.

    The edit-distance algorithm is the standard algorithm for (latin language) dictionary suggestions, and can work on whole texts. Two texts are similiar if they have basically the same words (eh letters) in the same order. So the following two book reviews would be fairly similiar:

    1) "This is a great book"

    2) "These are not great books"

    (The number of letters to remove, insert, delete or alter to turn (2) into (1) is termed the 'edit distance'.)

    To implement this you would want to visit every review programmatically. This is perhaps not as costly as it sounds, and if it is too costly you could do the comparisions as a background task and store the n-most-similiar in a database field itself.

    Another approach is to understand something of the structure of (latin) languages. If you strip short (non-capitialised or quoted) words, and assign weights to words (or prefixes) that are common or unique, you can do a Bayesianesque comparision. The two following book reviews might be simiplied and found to be similiar:

    3) "The french revolution was blah blah War and Peace blah blah France." -> France/French(2) Revolution(1) War(1) Peace(1) (note that a dictionary has been used to combine France and French)

    4) "This book is blah blah a revolution in french cuisine." -> France(1) Revolution(1)

    To implement this you would want to identify the 'keywords' in a review when it was created/updated, and to find similiar reviews use these keywords in the where-clause of a query (ideally 'full text' searching if the database supports it), with perhaps a post-processing of the results-set for scoring the candidates found.

    Books also have categories - are thrillers set in France similiar to historical studies of France, and so on? Meta-data beyond title and text might be useful for keeping results relevant.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 18:42

    Maybe what your looking for is something that does paraphrasing. I only have cursory knowledge of this, but paraphrasing is a natural language processing concept to determine if two passages of text actually mean the same thing - although the may use entirely different words.

    Unfortunately I don't know of any tools that allow you to do this (although I'd be interested in finding one)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 18:44

    I suggest to index your articles using Apache Lucene, a high-performance, full-featured text search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires full-text search, especially cross-platform. Once indexed, you could easily find related articles.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-11-28 18:45

    you can use the following

    1. Minhash/LSH https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MinHash

    (also see: http://infolab.stanford.edu/~ullman/mmds/book.pdf Minhash chapter), also see http://ann-benchmarks.com/ for state of the art

    1. collaborative filtering if you have info of users interaction with articles (clicks/likes/views): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_filtering

    2. word2vec or similar embeddings to compare articles in 'semantic' vector space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word2vec

    3. Latent semantic analysis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis

    4. Use Bag-of-words and apply some distance measure, like Jaccard coefficient to compute set similarity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaccard_index, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bag-of-words_model

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题