can anyone explain me why there is a deadlock in this code.Thanks
public class Deadlock {
static class Friend {
private final String name;
Consider the following:
run() { alphonse.bow(gaston); }
run() { gaston.bow(alphonse); }
alphonse.bow(gaston);
, locking alphonse
since bow()
is synchronized
gaston.bow(alphonse);
, locking gaston
since bow()
is synchronized
bower.bowBack(this);
evaluates to gaston.bowBack(alphonse);
gaston
, currently held by Thread2bower.bowBack(this);
evaluates to alphonse.bowBack(gaston);
alphonse
, currently held by Thread1The problem is that there is excessive synchronized
currently. There are many ways to "fix" this; here's an instructive solution:
public void bow(Friend bower) {
synchronized (this) {
System.out.format("%s: %s has bowed to me!%n",
this.name, bower.getName());
}
bower.bowBack(this);
}
public synchronized void bowBack(Friend bower) {
System.out.format("%s: %s has bowed back to me!%n",
this.name, bower.getName());
}
Now bowBack()
is fully synchronized
, but bow()
is only synchronized
partially, using the synchronized(this)
statement. This will prevent the deadlock.
Here are quotes from Effective Java 2nd Edition, Item 67: Avoid excessive synchronization
To avoid liveness and safety failures, never cede control to the client within a
synchronized
method or block. In other words, inside asynchronized
region, do not invoke a method designed to be overridden, or provided by a client in the form of a function object. From the perspective of theclass
with thesynchronized
region, such methods are alien. The class has no knowledge of what the method does and have no control over it. Depending on what an alien method does, calling it from asynchronized
region can cause exceptions, deadlocks, or data corruption.[...] As a rule, you should do as little work as possible inside
synchronized
regions. Obtain the lock, examine the shared data, transform it if necessary, and drop the lock.
In essence, bower.bowBack(this)
is an attempt to cede control to an alien method, because bowBack()
is not a final
method in class Friend
. Consider the following attempt to fix the problem, for example:
// attempt to fix: STILL BROKEN!!!
public synchronized void bow(Friend bower) {
System.out.format("%s: %s has bowed to me!%n",
this.name, bower.getName());
bower.bowBack(this);
// ceding control to alien method within synchronized block!
}
// not a final method, subclasses may @Override
public void bowBack(Friend bower) {
System.out.format("%s: %s has bowed back to me!%n",
this.name, bower.getName());
}
The above code will not deadlock with the current alphonse/gaston
scenario, but since bow()
cedes control to a non-final
method bowBack()
, a subclass can @Override
the method in such a way that will cause bow()
to deadlock. That is, bowBack()
is an alien method to bow()
, and thus should NOT have been invoked from within a synchronized
region.
Best way to understand is put below code in bow() before calling bower.bowBack
try {
Thread.sleep(1);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Here's how it probably will be executed.
alphonse.bow(gaston);
, alphonse is now locked due to synchronized
keywordgaston.bow(alphonse);
, gaston is now lockedbower.bowBack(this);
from first bow
method call because gaston (bower) is locked. Wait for lock to be released.bower.bowBack(this);
from second bow
method call because alphonse (bower) is locked. Wait for lock to be released.Both threads wait for each other to release lock.