can I prioritize more exact matches when using ngram filter in search results?

前端 未结 3 2103
一整个雨季
一整个雨季 2021-02-20 15:14

When using the ngram filter with elasticsearch so that when I search for something like \"test\" I return a document \"latest\", \"tests\" and \"test\". Is there a way to make i

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-02-20 15:51

    That is a bit of an issue with ngrams: you get a lot of false positives in your ranking. A solution is to combine ngrams with shingles. Basically in addition to the ngrams, you also index the full word as a separate term or even combinations of words. Shingles are basically like ngrams but with words rather than characters.

    That way, an exact match against the shingle terms scores higher than something that only matches the ngrams.

    Update. Here's an example of a custom analyzer. After you define it, you can use it in your mappings. In this case I use the icu_normalizer and folding and my suggestions_shingle. All this is set as the default analyzer so all my strings are handled this way.

    {
        "analyzer":{
            "default":{
                "tokenizer":"icu_tokenizer",
                "filter":"icu_normalizer,icu_folding,suggestions_shingle"
            }
        },
        "filter": {
            "suggestions_shingle": {
                "type": "shingle",
                "min_shingle_size": 2,
                "max_shingle_size": 5
            }
        }
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-20 16:11

    You need multifield and multimatch query.

    I have similar issue. I needed to search by first name, so if I put search term 'And', I get first 'Andy', and than 'Mandy'. With just nGram, I was not able to achieve that.

    I added one more analyzer that uses front edgeNGram (code below is for Spring Data Elasticsearch, but you can get the idea).

        setting.put("analysis.analyzer.word_parts.type", "custom");
        setting.put("analysis.analyzer.word_parts.tokenizer", "ngram_tokenizer");
        setting.put("analysis.analyzer.word_parts.filter", "lowercase");
    
        setting.put("analysis.analyzer.type_ahead.type", "custom");
        setting.put("analysis.analyzer.type_ahead.tokenizer", "edge_ngram_tokenizer");
        setting.put("analysis.analyzer.type_ahead.filter", "lowercase");
    
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.ngram_tokenizer.type", "nGram");
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.ngram_tokenizer.min_gram", "3");
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.ngram_tokenizer.max_gram", "50");
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.ngram_tokenizer.token_chars", new String[] { "letter", "digit" });
    
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.edge_ngram_tokenizer.type", "edgeNGram");
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.edge_ngram_tokenizer.min_gram", "2");
        setting.put("analysis.tokenizer.edge_ngram_tokenizer.max_gram", "20");
    

    I mapped the required fields as multiple field:

    @MultiField(mainField = @Field(type = FieldType.String, indexAnalyzer = "word_parts", searchAnalyzer = "standard"),
    otherFields = @NestedField(dotSuffix = "autoComplete", type = FieldType.String, searchAnalyzer = "standard", indexAnalyzer = "type_ahead"))
    private String firstName;
    

    For the query I am using multimatch were I first specify 'firstName.autoComplete', and than just 'firstName'

    QueryBuilders.multiMatchQuery(searchTerm, new String[]{"firstName.autoComplete", "firstName"})
    

    This seems to be working properly.

    In your case, if you need exact match, perhaps instead of 'edgeNGram' you could use just 'standard'.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-02-20 16:13

    You can copy the field content to fields via the mapping. Example:

      "fullName": {
        "type": "string",
        "search_analyzer": "str_search_analyzer",
        "index_analyzer": "str_index_analyzer",
        "fields": {
            "fullWord": { "type": "string" },
            "raw": { 
                "type":  "string",
                "index": "not_analyzed"
            }
        }
      }
    

    Note that str_index_analyzer uses nGram here. Then you can build your search to also search against these fields. Example:

    {
        "query": {
          "bool": {
            "should": [{
              "multi_match": {
                "fields": [
                  "firstName.fullWord",
                  ...
                "query": query,
                "fuzziness": "0"
              }
            }],
            "must": [{
              "multi_match": {
                "fields": [
                  "firstName",...],
                "query": query,
                "fuzziness": "AUTO"
              }
            }]
          }
        }
      };
    }
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题