I do not understand well the std::is_sorted algorithm and its default behaviour. If we look to cppreference, it says that by default std::is_sorted use
Even if you only have the < operator you can figure out if two numbers are equivalent not necessarily equal.
if !(first < second) and !(second < first)
then first equivalent to second
In addition, as paxdiablo's solution actually mentioned first, you could implement is_sorted as going up the list and continually checking for < not to be true, if it is ever true you stop.
Here is the correct behavior of the function from cplusplus.com
template <class ForwardIterator>
bool is_sorted (ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator last)
{
if (first==last) return true;
ForwardIterator next = first;
while (++next!=last) {
if (*next<*first) // or, if (comp(*next,*first)) for version (2)
return false;
++first;
}
return true;
}
You seem to be assuming that it's checking (for the positive case) if element N is less than element N+1 for all elements bar the last. That would indeed not work with just <, though you can use a 'trick' to evaluate <= with < and !: the following two are equivalent:
if (a <= b)
if ((a < b) || (!((b < a) || (a < b)))) // no attempt at simplification.
However, it's far more likely that it detects (the negative case) if element N is less than element N-1 for all but the first so that it can stop as soon as it finds a violation. That can be done with nothing more than <, something like (pseudocode):
for i = 1 to len - 1:
if elem[i] < elem[i-1]:
return false
return true
Per 25.4/5:
A sequence is sorted with respect to a comparator
compif for any iteratoripointing to the sequence and any non-negative integernsuch thati + nis a valid iterator pointing to an element of the sequence,comp(*(i + n), *i) == false.
So, for
1 2 3 3 4 5
std::less<int>()(*(i + n), *i) will return false for all n, while std::less_equal will return true for case 3 3.