Working in haskell, found odd behavior, stripped it down to bare bones
This Works
a :: Bool
a = case True of
True -> True
False -> Fals
The basic indentation rules are actually quite simple:
where,let,do,case .. of) note down the column where the next word starts (which might be in the next line)Tricky example:
1 + case x of
A -> 45 -- note where "A" starts
B -> 10 -- same indentation: another case branch
+ 2 -- more indented, so it's "10+2"
+ 10 -- less indented, so it's "1+(case ...)+10"
In your case,
let b' = case True of
True -> True
False -> False
we have two nested blocks, one for let and one for case..of. The let blocks uses the column of b'. The case..of block tries to reuse the same column, but we need to apply the rules the the outermost block, first. So the True -> ... line is actually a new entry of the let block. This triggers a parsing error.
I don't have the exact wording from the spec, but this Wikibook page explains the issue quite clearly.
The reason why it works like this is simple: to support binding multiple variables via a single let-group, such as:
c = do
let c' = …
d = …
e = …
return c'
Your True -> … and False -> … are mistakenly interpreted as additional variables to be bound.