Is there ever a situation where using equals(Boolean) and == would return different results when dealing with Boolean objects?
<
== only works for primitive types
when you compare Objects you should always use o.equls(Object ob)
How about:
System.out.println(new Boolean(true) == new Boolean(true));
System.out.println(new Boolean(true) == Boolean.TRUE);
(both print false, for the same reason as any other type of objects).
It would be dangerous to use == because myBoolean may not have originated from one of the constants, but have been constructed as new Boolean(boolValue), in which case == would always result in false. You can use just
myBoolean.booleanValue()
with neither == nor equals involved, giving reliable results. If you must cater for null-values as well, then there's nothing better than your equals approach.
if (Boolean.TRUE == new Boolean(true)) {
System.out.println("==");
}
if (Boolean.TRUE.equals(myBoolean)) {
System.out.println("equals");
}
In this case first one is false. Only second if condition is true.
It Prints:
equals