Why doesn't “git flow feature pull” track?

Question

Lets say I\'ve created a new feature with git flow feature start FEATURENAME

then published it with git flow feature publish FEATURENAME

<

Answer 1

Sounds like you are using git flow feature pull, where you should be using git flow feature track, since that does create a local branch that tracks the remote.

I can't really think of why I'd ever use git flow feature pull. It creates a local branch with no tracking set up on it, and I don't know why that would be useful! It's also badly named, since a pull should involve a merge, and this does not.