I don\'t quite understand why in SPARQL they haven\'t implemented the basic logic operators. However in most of the cases is possible to obtain the same result in a number of wa
I'm not entirely sure why you say SPARQL doesn't supply 'the basic logic operators', because your own examples clearly show that it does: it provides logical-OR (||) and logical-AND (&&) as part of FILTER conditions, and disjunctive graph patterns using UNION (of course, conjunctive graph patterns need no special syntax).
Other variations of OR-like constructs are also possible. For queries of the form "this particular value must be one of these possibilities" you can use the set membership operator, IN:
SELECT *
WHERE {
?s ?p ?o.
FILTER (?p IN (:propA, :propB, :propC ) )
}
You can also use the VALUES clause for this kind of pattern:
SELECT *
WHERE {
VALUES ?p { :propA :propB :propC }
?s ?p ?o.
}
Update I forgot one, perhaps the simplest. For queries such as yours, where you are looking for a few alternatives for a property name, you can actually use a property path expression as well, like so:
SELECT *
WHERE {
?s :propA|:propB|:propC ?o.
}