Make (install from source) python without running tests

后端 未结 4 2072
情深已故
情深已故 2021-02-01 01:33

I compiling python from source tar. All works good, but tests running 2 hours and two times. How to bypass these tests?

0:16:20 [178/405] test_inspect
0:16:26 [1         


        
4条回答
  •  眼角桃花
    2021-02-01 02:24

    I did some (quick) research on skipping the test runs when building Python by instructing either:

    • configure - passing some args (e.g. --without-tests, --disable-tests, --skip-tests)
    • make - specifying some variable (either via env vars or cmdline)

    The former yielded no results. The latter (by looking in the Makefile template) revealed the fact that test execution is invoked by calling ${PYTHON_SRC_DIR}/Tools/scripts/run_tests.py (which sets some stuff and calls another script, which calls another one, ...).
    Note that I found the file on Python 3.5(.4) and Python 3.6(.4) but not on Python 2.7(.14). A little bit more research revealed that it is possible to skip the (above) test run. What you need to do is:

    make -C dl/Python-${PYTHON_VERSION} -j8 EXTRATESTOPTS=--list-tests install
    

    Notes:

    • Googleing didn't reveal anything (relevant) on EXTRATESTOPTS, so I guess it's not officialy supported
    • You could also set EXTRATESTOPTS=--list-tests as an environment variable, before launching (inner) make
    • Needless to say that if some "minor" error happened during build (e.g. a non critical external module (like _ssl.so for example) failed to build), there will be no tests to fail, so you'll only find about it at runtime (which would be terribly nasty if it would happen in production)

    @EDIT0:

    After @amohr 's comment, I decided to play a little bit more, so I ran the whole process:

    1. configure (opts)
    2. make (opts)
    3. make install

    on a Lnx (Ubtu 16) machine with 2 CPUs, where one (full) test run takes ~24 minutes. Here are my findings (Python 3.6):

    • It ran successfully on Python 3.5(.4)
    • The solution that I suggested earlier, operates at the 3rd step, so it only skips the 2nd test run: it operates on the (root) Makefile's test target (make test) which is invoked by install target
    • Regarding the 1st test run, by checking the Makefile, and make's output, here's what I discovered that happens at the 2nd (make) step:

      1. The C sources are built "normally"
      2. Tests are being run (I deducted that some profile data is stored somewhere)
      3. The C sources are rebuilt with different flags (e.g. in my case gcc's -fprofile-generate was replaced by -fprofile-use -fprofile-correction (check [GNU.GCC]: Options That Control Optimization for more details)) to make use of the profile info generated at previous (sub) step
    • Skipping the 1st test run would automatically imply no optimizations. Way(s) of achieving:

      1. make build_all (at 2nd step) - as suggested by other answers

        • Here's a snippet of the (root) Makefile generated by configure (with --enable-optimizations):

          all:            profile-opt
          build_all:      check-clean-src $(BUILDPYTHON) oldsharedmods sharedmods gdbhooks \
                          Programs/_testembed python-config
          
        • And here's one without it:

          all:            build_all
          build_all:      check-clean-src $(BUILDPYTHON) oldsharedmods sharedmods gdbhooks \
                          Programs/_testembed python-config
          
        • As seen, running:

          1. configure --enable-optimizations
          2. make build_all

          is identical to:

          1. configure
          2. make
      2. Manually modifying the (root) Makefile between 1st (configure --enable-optimizations) and 2nd (make) steps:

        • Find the macro definition PROFILE_TASK=-m test.regrtest --pgo (for me it was around line ~250)
        • Add --list-tests at the end
        • Substeps (#2.)#1. and (#2.)#3. are exactly the same, while for (#2.)#2., the tests are not being run. That can mean that either:
          • The 2nd sources build is identical to the 1st one (which would make it completely useless)
          • The 2nd does some optimizations (without having any information), which means that it could crash at runtime (I think / hope it's the former case)

提交回复
热议问题