There\'s a new comparison operator <=>
in C++20. However I think in most cases a simple subtraction works well:
int my_strcmp(const char *a, c
There are some meaningful answers here on the difference, but Herb Sutter in his paper specifically says:
<=> is for type implementers: User code (including generic code) outside the implementation of an operator<=> should almost never invoke an <=> directly (as already discovered as a good practice in other languages);
So even if there was no difference, the point of the operator is different: to aid class writers to generate comparison operators.
The core difference between the subtraction operator and the "spaceship" operator (according to Sutter's proposal) is that overloading operator-
gives you a subtraction operator, whereas overloading operator<=>
:
default
: no code to write!);Other differences are in the return value: operator<=>
would return an enum
of a class, the class specifies whether the type is sortable and whether the sort is strong or weak. The return value would convert to -1, 0 or 1 (though Sutter leaves room for the return type to also indicate distance, as strcmp
does). In any case, assuming the -1, 0, 1 return value, we'll finally get a true signum function in C++! (signum(x) == x<=>0
)