When creating a new project with CLI (v3.7.0), there is an option to choose between dart-sass or node-sass compiler.
How do these compare to eac
node-sass may be faster than dart-sass, but as of writing this dart-sass is the only library which implements the @use rule, which is strongly recommended over @import. According to the official sass-lang website:
What’s Wrong With
@import? The@importrule has a number of serious issues:
@importmakes all variables, mixins, and functions globally accessible. This makes it very difficult for people (or tools) to tell where anything is defined.Because everything’s global, libraries must prefix to all their members to avoid naming collisions.
@extendrules are also global, which makes it difficult to predict which style rules will be extended.Each stylesheet is executed and its CSS emitted every time it’s
@imported, which increases compilation time and produces bloated output.There was no way to define private members or placeholder selectors that were inaccessible to downstream stylesheets.
The new module system and the
@userule address all these problems.
Additionally, @import will be gradually phased out over the next few years, and eventually removed from the language entirely.
In order to stay up-to-date with the best practices in Sass, you should use dart-sass (i.e. sass) for now.