Virtualized SQL Server: Why not?

Question

The IT department where I work is trying to move to 100% virtualized servers, with all the data stored on a SAN. They haven\'t done it yet, but the plan eventually calls for mo

Answer 1

You are looking at this from the wrong angle. First, you are not going to find White Papers from Vendors why you should "not" virtualize or why you should Virtualize.

Every environment is different and you need to do what works in your Environment. With that said, there are some servers that are perfect for virtualization and there are some that should not be virtualized. For example, if your SQL Server/s are doing millions and millions of transactions per second, like if your server was located at the NYSE or the NASDAQ and millions and millions of dollars depend on it, you probably should not virtualize it. Make sure you understand the ramifications of virtualizing an SQL server.

I've seen where people virtualize SQL over and over just because Virtualization is cool. Then complain later on when the VM server does not perform as expected.

What you need to do is set a benchmark, fully test the solution you want to deploy and show what it can and can't do so you don't run into any surprises. Virtualization is great, it is good for the envronment and saves through consolidation, but you need to show why your supervisors why you should not virtualize your SQL Servers and only you can do this.