Why is x == (x = y) not the same as (x = y) == x?

前端 未结 14 1052
误落风尘
误落风尘 2021-01-29 21:11

Consider the following example:

class Quirky {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int x = 1;
        int y = 3;

        System.out.println(x =         


        
14条回答
  •  臣服心动
    2021-01-29 22:00

    which, by the order implied by brackets, should be calculated first

    No. It is a common misconception that parentheses have any (general) effect on calculation or evaluation order. They only coerce the parts of your expression into a particular tree, binding the right operands to the right operations for the job.

    (And, if you don't use them, this information comes from the "precedence" and associativity of the operators, something that's a result of how the language's syntax tree is defined. In fact, this is still exactly how it works when you use parentheses, but we simplify and say that we're not relying on any precedence rules then.)

    Once that's done (i.e. once your code has been parsed into a program) those operands still need to be evaluated, and there are separate rules about how that is done: said rules (as Andrew has shown us) state that the LHS of each operation is evaluated first in Java.

    Note that this is not the case in all languages; for example, in C++, unless you're using a short-circuiting operator like && or ||, the evaluation order of operands is generally unspecified and you shouldn't rely on it either way.

    Teachers need to stop explaining operator precedence using misleading phrases like "this makes the addition happen first". Given an expression x * y + z the proper explanation would be "operator precedence makes the addition happen between x * y and z, rather than between y and z", with no mention of any "order".

提交回复
热议问题