I\'m writing a Scala program and I want it to work with two version of a big library.
This big library\'s version 2 changes the API very slightly (only
I see some options but none if them is "conditional compilation"
The problem is - what if you build the code against v1 and user provided v2? Or the opposite? You emitted the bytecode but JVM expects something else and it all crashes.
Virtually every time you have such compatibility breaking changes, library either refuses to update or fork. Not because you wouldn't be able to generate 2 versions - you would. Problem is in the downstream - how would your users deal with this situation. If you are writing an application you can commit to one of these. If you are writing library and you don't want to lock users to your choices... you have to publish separate version for each choice.
Theoretically you could create one project, with 2 modules, which share the same code and use different branches like #ifdef
macros in C++ using Scala macros or Scalameta - but that is a disaster if you want to use IDE or publish sourcecode that your users can use in IDE. No source to look at. No way to jump to the definition's source. Disassembled byte code at best.
So the solution that you simply have separate source directories for mismatching versions is much easier to read, write and maintain in a long run.