Likeness - polishing and packaging

Question

I\'m using Ploeh.SemanticComparison\'s Likeness as a way to effectively express intended outputs of a mapping process (as described in Mark Seemann\'s

Answer 1

If you had an Assertion helper class called AssertResemblance (like [4]), and a static helper like [1] in scope you could say it like:

var expected = new { ProductId = id, Name = name, Version = version };
AssertResemblance.Like( expected, result, WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier );

Or if you had an extension method like [2], you could do it like:

AssertResemblance.Like( expected,result,x=>x.WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier());

Or you could have the best of both worlds (no noise as in the first snippet) yet naming the Resemblance (by having the actual impl in an extension method) by implementing a local static helper in terms of the extension method ([2]) as in [3].

---

[1]

public static Likeness WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier( Likeness that )
{
    return that.Without( x => x.ProgrammaticIdentifier );
}

[2]

static class NewMappingsEventResemblances
{
    public static Likeness WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier( this Likeness that )
    {
        return that.Without( x => x.ProgrammaticIdentifier );
    }
}

[3]

static Likeness WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier( Likeness that )
{
    return that.WithoutProgrammaticIdentifier();
}

[4]

static class AssertResemblance
{
    public static void Like( T expected, T2 actual )
    {
        Like( expected, actual, x => x );
    }

    public static void Like( T expected, T2 actual, Func, Likeness> configureLikeness )
    {
        var likeness = expected.AsSource().OfLikeness();
        configureLikeness( likeness ).ShouldEqual( actual );
    }
}