I am currently studying for a concurrent programming exam and don\'t understand why the output of this program is 43. Why is x = y + 1 executed before t.s
According to JMM:
A call to start() on a thread happens-before any actions in the started thread.
and
If x and y are actions of the same thread and x comes before y in program order, then hb(x, y).
Definition of program order is this:
Among all the inter-thread actions performed by each thread t, the program order of t is a total order that reflects the order in which these actions would be performed according to the intra-thread semantics of t.
The inter-thread semantic is well defined concept in JMM. It means that the order of instructions in a program performed by each thread must be preserved as it is written in the program text.
Applying all these to your case:
t.start(); hb x = y + 1; //program order
t.start(); hb y = x; // happens-before rule specified here
Without additional synchronization we cannot say how x = y + 1; and y = x; relates to each other (From JMM standpoint).
If you are trying to answer the question "What can happen at runtime in my case?". Can happen lots of things... Take a look at this asnwer. Runtime can perform non-trivial optimisations which are consitent with JMM.
Anyway if you are interested about internals you can take a look at this article (Memory Barriers Can Be Avoided). As you can see in the generated assembly, no memory barrier is applied when performing volatile read. I mean that runtime can optimize in anyway... As long the JMM rules are preserved...