I have a table which has a clustered index on two columns - the primary key for the table. It is defined as follows:
ALTER TABLE Table ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_T
If your table is getting up to 1 TB in size and probably has LOTS of rows in it, I would strongly recommend NOT making the clustered index that much fatter!
First of all, dropping and recreating the clustered index will shuffle around ALL your data at least once - that alone will take ages.
Secondly, the big compound clustered index you're trying to create will significantly increase the size of all your non-clustered indices (since they contain the whole clustered index value on each leaf node, for the bookmark lookups).
The question is more: why are you trying to do this?? Couldn't you just add another non-clustered index with those columns, to potentially cover your queries? Why does this have to be the clustered index?? I don't see any advantage in that....
For more information on indexing and especially the clustered index debate, see Kimberly Tripp's blog on SQL Server indexes - very helpful!
Marc