Does the C# 4.0 “dynamic” keyword make Generics redundant?

Question

I\'m very excited about the dynamic features in C# (C#4 dynamic keyword - why not?), especially because in certain Library parts of my code I use a lot of reflection.

Answer 1

Answer to the second question: You can return anonymous types in C# 3.0. Cast the type to object, return it and use reflection to access it's members. The dynamic keyword is just syntactic sugar for that.