While studying for my finals, I came across the following statement in the book from which I am currently studying. Considering the following code :
class A
It looks like the compiler tries to create a call to the superclasses default constructor with super(), which isn't avaliable:
required: int
found: no arguments
But back to your book: I've never heard of a rule that you can skip the super statement in a constructor if the actual constructor has the exact same parameter list as a constructor in the direct superclass. Only a call to the superclass's default constructor is added implicitly (super()) but that requires that the superclass has a default constructor.
In contrast to what's written in your book (or in contrast to your understanding of the written text), here's a sentence from the language spec:
If a constructor body does not begin with an explicit constructor invocation and the constructor being declared is not part of the primordial class Object, then the constructor body is implicitly assumed by the compiler to begin with a super class constructor invocation “super();”, an invocation of the constructor of its direct superclass that takes no arguments.