I\'ve been using Data.Binary to serialize data to files. In my application I incrementally add items to these files. The two most popular serialization packages, binary an
It's four years since this question has been answered, but I ran into the same problems as gatoatigrado in the comment to Don Stewart's answer. The put
method works as advertised, but get
reads the whole input. I believe the problem lies in the pattern match in the case statement, Stream xs <- get
, which must determine whether or not the remaining get
is a Stream a
or not before returning.
My solution used the example in Data.Binary.Get as a starting point:
import Data.ByteString.Lazy(toChunks,ByteString)
import Data.Binary(Binary(..),getWord8)
import Data.Binary.Get(pushChunk,Decoder(..),runGetIncremental)
import Data.List(unfoldr)
decodes :: Binary a => ByteString -> [a]
decodes = runGets (getWord8 >> get)
runGets :: Get a -> ByteString -> [a]
runGets g = unfoldr (decode1 d) . toChunks
where d = runGetIncremental g
decode1 _ [] = Nothing
decode1 d (x:xs) = case d `pushChunk` x of
Fail _ _ str -> error str
Done x' _ a -> Just (a,x':xs)
k@(Partial _) -> decode1 k xs
Note the use of getWord8
This is to read the encoded []
and :
resulting from the definition of put
for the stream instance. Also note, since getWord8 ignores the encoded [] and : symbols, this implementation will not detect the end of the list. My encoded file was just a single list so it works for that, but otherwise you'll need to modify.
In any case, this decodes
ran in constant memory in both cases of accessing the head and last elements.