Should one prefer STL algorithms over hand-rolled loops?

Question

I seem to be seeing more \'for\' loops over iterators in questions & answers here than I do for_each(), transform(), and the like. Scott Meyers suggests that stl algori

Answer 1

The std::foreach is the kind of code that made me curse the STL, years ago.

I cannot say if it's better, but I like more to have the code of my loop under the loop preamble. For me, it is a strong requirement. And the std::foreach construct won't allow me that (strangely enough, the foreach versions of Java or C# are cool, as far as I am concerned... So I guess it confirms that for me the locality of the loop body is very very important).

So I'll use the foreach only if there is only already a readable/understandable algorithm usable with it. If not, no, I won't. But this is a matter of taste, I guess, as I should perhaps try harder to understand and learn to parse all this thing...

Note that the people at boost apparently felt somewhat the same way, for they wrote BOOST_FOREACH:

#include 
#include 
#include 

int main()
{
    std::string hello( "Hello, world!" );

    BOOST_FOREACH( char ch, hello )
    {
        std::cout << ch;
    }

    return 0;
}

See : http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_35_0/doc/html/foreach.html