getting c++11 - compliant compiler

后端 未结 3 1289
忘了有多久
忘了有多久 2020-12-29 10:12

This all seems like a colossal mess.
All I want is a compiler that implements C++11, so I can use . But I\'m so confused from the very beginni

3条回答
  •  慢半拍i
    慢半拍i (楼主)
    2020-12-29 10:57

    Here's the situation on OS X.

    There are two C++ compilers installed by default.

    [5:49pm][wlynch@watermelon ~] g++ --version
    i686-apple-darwin11-llvm-g++-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2336.11.00)
    
    [5:49pm][wlynch@watermelon ~] clang++ --version
    Apple LLVM version 4.2 (clang-425.0.24) (based on LLVM 3.2svn)
    

    g++ is running llvm-gcc, which is the gcc frontend, and then the llvm backend.

    clang++ is running clang, which is the clang frontend and then the llvm backend.

    If you want a C++11 compiler on OS X without installing other packages, your only option is to use the clang compiler.

    The flags necessary are:

    clang++ -stdlib=libc++ -std=gnu++11
    

    To describe the two flags I'm passing:

    • -stdlib=libc++ uses the libc++ standard library, instead of the gnu libstdc++. On OS X, the libc++ version has c++11 support. The gnu libstdc++ one does not.
    • -std=gnu++11 tells the compiler to support c++11 code features, like lambdas and enum class. You can also pass -std=c++11, which is similar, but does not enable some commonly expected gnu extensions.

    Update for OS X 10.9: As of OS X Mavericks, both g++ and clang++ are actually using clang. The only difference, is that g++ will imply -stdlib=libstdc++ and clang++ will imply -stdlib=libc++. So, on Mavericks, if you'd like to use C++11, you can follow the above advice, or just do:

    clang++ -std=gnu++11
    

    Update for OS X 10.10: As of OS X Yosemite, g++ is still clang in disguise. However, neither uses libstdc++ by default anymore. Both are now on libc++.

提交回复
热议问题