While studying the book \"Introduction to Algorithms by Cormen\", I found a strange thing. Everywhere if it refers to an increasing order, the book refers it as \"non-decrea
It depends on the way the author defines these terms.
In your case the authors distinguish non-decreasing (1, 2, 2, 3) and increasing (1, 2, 3). This makes sense in the context of a total order, where not a > b implies a <= b.
Other people call this increasing (1, 2, 2, 3) and strictly increasing (1, 2, 3). This makes more sense in the context of a partial order, where for two distinct elements a and b it may be the case that neither a < b nor b < a holds.