What version numbering scheme to use?

前端 未结 5 2019
梦如初夏
梦如初夏 2020-12-23 02:05

I\'m looking for a version numbering scheme that expresses the extent of change, especially compatiblity.

Apache APR, for example, use the well known version number

5条回答
  •  既然无缘
    2020-12-23 02:54

    After reading a lot of articles/QAs/FAQs/books I become to think that [MAJOR].[MINOR].[REV] is most useful versioning schema to describe compatibility between project version (versioning schema for developer, does not for marketing).

    MAJOR changes is backward incompatible and require changing project name, path to files, GUIDs, etc.

    MINOR changes is backward compatible. Mark introduction of new features.

    REV for security/bug fixes. Backward and forward compatible.

    This versioning schema inspired by libtool versioning semantics and by articles:

    http://www106.pair.com/rhp/parallel.html

    NOTE: I also recommend provide build/date/custom/quality as additional info (build number, build date, customer name, release quality):

    Hello app v2.6.34 for National bank, 2011-05-03, beta, build 23545

    But this info is not versioning info!

提交回复
热议问题