Procedural is part of the procedural/functional/logical (or logic oriented) distinction (compare c, lisp, and prolog) between different ways of describing what a program should do.
Object orientation is orthogonal to this other idea, and describes a means of grouping sub-programs with data. C++ and java are procedural languages with object oriented features; fortran77 is a procedural languages without object oriented features. Common lisp supports object orientation; some older lisps do not. Plain vanilla prolog does not support objects, and I can't name a logic oriented language that does (I don't do logic oriented programming, it is on my list of things to do when I have some copious spare time. I barely do functional programming).
As others have noted, however, proper object oriented thinking changes how you do your programming as much as a switch from procedural to functional.
BTW-- I see "procedural" used a lot to distinguish non-object-oriented procedural languages from their object-oriented brethren, but I think this is a poor usage driven by the lack of a clean adjective for "not object oriented". YMMV.