Is there any relation between the class that implements interface and that interface?

Question

Consider this class hierarchy:

• Book extends Goods
• Book implements Taxable

As we know, there is a relationship

Answer 1

What's all the excitement about? The multiple question marks and multiple exclamation points?

Does it bother you that we can say a Book is Taxable, even though Taxable is an interface? Please calm down.

There are different keywords in the language for a class' relationship to an interface and to a superclass, but the conceptual nature of that relationship is the same, therefore it's entirely reasonable to use the same English terms to describe it. A Book is Taxable, just as a Book is a Good. To bring the terms even closer, a Book is a TaxableItem. It's OK.