Can I test method call order with AAA syntax in Rhino-Mocks 3.6?

Question

Is it possible to test for the following example if the Method1 called 1st, then Method2 called after and then Method3 by using the AAA syntax, in Rhino-mocks 3.6 ?

Answer 1

The mocks.Ordered() syntax specified by @craastad is the right way to do it, but I couldn't get it to work in RhinoMocks 3.5 - instead I had to tweak it to work without the instance of MockRepository that @craastad's solution used to call Ordered() on:

var fooMock = MockRepository.GenerateMock();
using (fooMock.GetMockRepository().Ordered())
{
    fooMock.Expect(x => x.Method1());
    fooMock.Expect(x => x.Method2());
}

var bar = new Bar(fooMock);
bar.DoWork();

fooMock.VerifyAllExpectations();

If you do it this way, it also appears to be unnecessary to call fooMock.Replay() either.