Anything wrong with using windows-1252 instead of UTF-8

Question

I have a test site that has been using windows-1252 all along. They do need/use some symbols like the square root symbol. And they have no need to display in another langu

Answer 1

Windows 1252 is one of the many many fixed size character sets. Mac has its own set. there are a few ISO for various parts of the Europe and for some other parts of the world. Most of them have slight variations.

The good point is that you have a fixed-size character, meaning 1 character = 1 byte no matter what.

The bad points are:

• Some people may not have your encoding installed
• Some people may use a slightly different encoding, resulting in very few issues, not obvious to see, but very ugly on the long run
• You can only support a few languages

That include any citation you would like to make. In windows-1252 you can't display russian, greek, polish ...

UTF-8 is the standard encoding for unicode representation on 1+ bytes. It can represent a very large majority of the characters you may encounter, although it is designed for latin-based languages, as other languages take more storage space.

It in used in XML, JSON, and most types of web services you may find. It is a good default when you don't know what encoding to use. It allows to limit the number of encoding issues, such as "I though you were in Latin-1 / No, I was using latin-9, but then this guy on mac used Roman". If you have more than 1 people working on the content of the website, they may have different encodings on their plateforme, and therefore your content may be messed up at some point.

UTF-8 is, as far as I know, the only way to easily standardize the encoding used between people without discussion.

Typical example is, if your website is encoded in windows1252, and the new dev has a mac, you'll probably be in trouble.