C++ guarantee and name for POD-like data, memcpy capable

Question

In another question I incorrectly used the term POD to refer to data types that aren\'t actually POD types (on account of having a constructor). Now, I\'ve looked through th

Answer 1

The notion of POD in C++03 is too strict indeed. In C++0x POD is generalized to include the objects you described too. So don't worry, you can name it POD. See a nice summery on Wikipedia.