Elastic search or Trie for search/autocomplete?

前端 未结 1 590
Happy的楠姐
Happy的楠姐 2020-12-17 02:40

My understanding how autocomplete/search for text/item works at high level in any scalable product like Amazon eCommerce/Google at high level was :-

1条回答
  •  离开以前
    2020-12-17 03:39

    ES autocompletion can be achieved in two ways:

    1. using prefix queries
    2. either using (edge-)ngrams
    3. or using the completion suggester

    The first option is the poor man's completion feature. I'm mentioning it because it can be useful in certain situation but you should avoid it if you have a substantial amount of documents.

    The second option uses the conventional ES indexing features, i.e. it will tokenize the text, all (edge-)ngrams will be indexed and then you can search for any prefix/infix/suffix that have been indexed.

    The third option uses a different approach and is optimized for speed. Basically, when indexing a field of type completion, ES will create a "finite state transducer" and store it in memory for ultra fast access.

    A finite state transducer is close to a trie in terms of implementation. You can check this excellent article which shows how trie compares to finite state transducer

    UPDATE (June 25th, 2019):

    ES 7.2 introduced a new data type called search_as_you_type that allows this kind of behavior natively. Read more at: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.2/search-as-you-type.html

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题