Just wondering if there is anyway to represent the following code in C# 3.5:
public struct Foo {
public Foo(T item) {
this.Item = item;
Conversion operators can't be generic. From the spec section 10.10, here's the format of a conversion-operator-declarator:
conversion-operator-declarator:
implicit operator type ( type identifier )
explicit operator type ( type identifier )
Compare this with, say, a method-header:
method-header: attributesopt method-modifiersopt partialopt return-type member-name type-parameter-listopt ( formal-parameter-listopt ) type-parameter-constraints-clausesopt
(Sorry about the formatting - not sure how to do it better.)
Note that the operator format doesn't include a type parameter list or type parameter constraints.