I have two dataframes currently, one for donors
and one for fundraisers
. I\'m trying to find if any fundraisers
also gave donations, a
I would use Jaro-Winkler, because it is one of the most performant and accurate approximate string matching algorithms currently available [Cohen, et al.], [Winkler].
This is how I would do it with Jaro-Winkler from the jellyfish package:
def get_closest_match(x, list_strings):
best_match = None
highest_jw = 0
for current_string in list_strings:
current_score = jellyfish.jaro_winkler(x, current_string)
if(current_score > highest_jw):
highest_jw = current_score
best_match = current_string
return best_match
df1 = pandas.DataFrame([[1],[2],[3],[4],[5]], index=['one','two','three','four','five'], columns=['number'])
df2 = pandas.DataFrame([['a'],['b'],['c'],['d'],['e']], index=['one','too','three','fours','five'], columns=['letter'])
df2.index = df2.index.map(lambda x: get_closest_match(x, df1.index))
df1.join(df2)
Output:
number letter
one 1 a
two 2 b
three 3 c
four 4 d
five 5 e
Update: Use jaro_winkler from the Levenshtein module for improved performance.
from jellyfish import jaro_winkler as jf_jw
from Levenshtein import jaro_winkler as lv_jw
%timeit jf_jw("appel", "apple")
>> 339 ns ± 1.04 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)
%timeit lv_jw("appel", "apple")
>> 193 ns ± 0.675 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each)