C++ Thread taking reference argument failed compile

前端 未结 2 878
执念已碎
执念已碎 2020-12-16 03:08
#include
#include
using namespace std;

void f1(double& ret) {
   ret=5.;
}

int main() {
   double ret=0.;
   thread t1(f1, ret);
         


        
2条回答
  •  佛祖请我去吃肉
    2020-12-16 03:47

    I know if I pass a value, the thread will only work on the copy and has no effect after the thread returns.

    No, that's not correct. The code should not silently make a copy and work on the copy, the standard says it must not even compile.

    The standard requires that the arguments to the called function are copied (into storage managed by the C++ runtime) and then the copies are forwarded as rvalues. So in your example f1 gets passed an rvalue of type double and the parameter of type double& cannot bind to that rvalue.

    The reason the standard requires that is so there is no silent copying and loss of data: if the function requires a modifiable reference then it won't compile unless you pass a reference explicitly using a reference_wrapper.

    The compiler error you get involves result_of because that's how I made GCC's std::thread check if the function can be called with the supplied arguments. I use result_of to check if the function pointer &f1 (which is of type void(*)(double&)) can be called with an rvalue of type double. It can't be called with an argument of that type, so the nested type result_of::type is not defined, so the compiler says:

    error: no type named 'type' in 'class std::result_of'
    

    The error is a bit confusing because the C++ declarator rules mean that decltype(&f1)(double) gets displayed as void(*(double))(double&).

    That is not my concern. I want to know why it is giving error now, but it was not giving error to other posts on SO

    Those posts were using an old pre-C++11 or non-conforming compiler which didn't meet the requirements of the C++11 standard and incorrectly compiled the code.

提交回复
热议问题