I already know \"xgboost.XGBRegressor is a Scikit-Learn Wrapper interface for XGBoost.\"
But do they have any other difference?
From my opinion the main difference is the training/prediction speed.
For further reference I will call the xgboost.train - 'native_implementation' and XGBClassifier.fit - 'sklearn_wrapper'
I have made some benchmarks on a dataset shape (240000, 348)
Fit/train time:
sklearn_wrapper time = 89 seconds
native_implementation time = 7 seconds
Prediction time:
sklearn_wrapper = 6 seconds
native_implementation = 3.5 milliseconds
I believe this is reasoned by the fact that sklearn_wrapper is designed to use the pandas/numpy objects as input where the native_implementation needs the input data to be converted into a xgboost.DMatrix object.
In addition one can optimise n_estimators using a native_implementation.