I have an abstract class that defines a get, but not set, because as far as that abstract class is concerned, it needs only a get.
Siege
abstract class TestBase
{
public abstract int Int { get; }
}
class TestDerivedHelper : TestBase
{
private int _Int;
public override int Int
{
get
{
return _Int;
}
}
protected void SetInt(int value)
{
this._Int = value;
}
}
class TestDerived : TestDerivedHelper
{
public new int Int
{
get { return base.Int; }
set { base.SetInt(value); }
}
}
Using TestDerived will have the functionality you're looking for. The only drawback I can see from this method is that you have to implement every abstract method in TestDerivedHelper, but it gives you more control later.
I use this approach and works very well for me. Also, I made my "TestDerivedHelper" class abstract too, then all the methods must be implemented on "TestDerived" class.