Was the misspelling of the HTTP field name Referer intentional?

Question

I read recently (I can\'t recall where, or I\'d return to that source) that the misspelling of HTTP header field name Referer in the specification was intentional. Is that

Answer 1

I believe it was a mistake that was only picked up after release, at that point it was too late to change it and a lot of dependencies already existed.

a wiki link to (semi) prove it :)