I have just found out that the following is not valid.
//Header File
class test
{
const static char array[] = { \'1\', \'2\', \'3\' };
};
With constexpr you must define the value on the header even in C++11
If you use constexpr instead of const, then this answer suggests that you not only can, but must, define on header even in C++11:
#include
struct MyClass {
static constexpr int is[] = {1, 2, 3};
static constexpr int i = 1;
};
// TODO is this ever mandatory? Create example that fails on -std=c++11.
// Pretty sure never mandatory in C++17 https://stackoverflow.com/a/40959093/895245
// constexpr int MyClass::is[];
int main (void) {
assert(MyClass::is[0] == 1);
assert(&MyClass::is[0] == &MyClass::is[1] - 1);
assert(MyClass::i == 1);
assert(&MyClass::i == &MyClass::i);
}
Compile and run with:
g++-10 -ggdb3 -O0 -std=c++11 -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -o main.out main.cpp
./main.out
If instead you try:
struct MyClass {
static constexpr int is[];
};
constexpr int MyClass::is[] = {1, 2, 3};
compilation fails with:
main.cpp:4:26: error: ‘constexpr’ static data member ‘is’ must have an initializer
Tested on Ubuntu 20.04.